Find out whether the company controls retention or explains churn afterward.

Twenty questions test whether customer value, risk, renewal, expansion, ownership, and learning operate as one controlled lifecycle.

Start the assessment

Retention is a company system, not one team's metric.

A renewal outcome is shaped by what was sold, what was delivered, whether value was realized, what the customer is doing now, how risk moves, and who can act before the commercial deadline.

No name, email, company, or phone number is requested. Finish the questions and the result appears here in your browser.

0 of 20 answeredComplete every question to see the result.

Shared retention definitions

Teams are managing the same customer states and commercial outcomes.

Active, renewed, churned, contracted, expanded, and at-risk customers have shared definitions across customer, sales, finance, and leadership reporting.
The company distinguishes customer health, renewal likelihood, realized value, product adoption, and payment status instead of collapsing them into one score.
Renewal, contraction, cancellation, and expansion effective dates use approved timing rules that reconcile across systems.
The company can identify the customer population used for retention and expansion metrics without rebuilding it before each review.

Customer evidence

Risk and opportunity are supported by observable customer reality.

The customer outcome originally sold and the evidence of value realized are visible to the team managing retention.
Usage, adoption, support, delivery, stakeholder, and payment signals are connected to the correct customer and account context.
Material changes in champions, decision makers, usage, service quality, scope, or payment behavior are recorded early enough to affect action.
Renewal dates, notice periods, contract constraints, and expansion eligibility are visible beside the customer evidence used to make decisions.

Ownership and intervention

Signals trigger named action before the customer outcome is locked in.

Every material retention risk has a named accountable owner rather than shared awareness without decision authority.
Defined thresholds convert customer evidence into a required intervention, escalation, or management decision.
At-risk plans record the cause, evidence, action, owner, due date, customer commitment, and next decision instead of only a status label.
Exceptions can move through a defined cross-functional escalation path without requiring executive rescue for routine cases.

Renewal and expansion execution

Commercial action begins early enough and uses the same customer truth.

Renewal planning starts from a defined trigger far enough ahead of contractual deadlines to change the outcome.
Renewal ownership, commercial authority, pricing decisions, and customer-success ownership are explicit when more than one team participates.
Expansion opportunities require observable customer need, value, capacity, or usage evidence rather than only seller intuition or account size.
Renewal, expansion, contraction, and cancellation decisions update contracts, billing, entitlements, account plans, and reporting through one controlled change path.

Learning loop

Customer outcomes change the upstream system instead of becoming explanations.

Churn, contraction, failed renewal, and failed expansion reasons preserve evidence and distinguish proximate explanation from upstream operating cause.
Retention and expansion outcomes are reviewed by meaningful cohort, segment, product, or lifecycle condition instead of only a company-wide average.
Repeated customer failures reach the upstream sales, onboarding, product, delivery, support, billing, or management owner responsible for changing the system.
Management verifies whether corrective actions reduced the targeted churn, risk, delay, or missed expansion pattern before closing the issue.